IMMIGRANTS & EMPLOYMENT

Workplace Enforcement by Immigration Authorities

Immigration

Employment Issues

Public Benefits

Driver's Licenses

DREAM Act

Search

 

THE LOS ANGELES RAPID RESPONSE NETWORK

How Advocates Prepared for and What They Learned from the Recent Workplace Raid in Van Nuys

(Continued)

Protecting Against Out-of-District Transfers, and Helping to Locate Detainees

     Following a large-scale worksite raid such as the one at MSE, attorneys and advocates will need to rely on any tool available to locate those who are detained, which is essential to ensuring that the detainees are provided access to counsel and that their children and other dependants do not go uncared for.  One tool that has been used effectively is the permanent injunction in Orantes-Hernandez v. Gonzalez, No. 82-01107 MMM (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 26, 2007) (modified, consolidated injunction), which applies nationwide to nationals of El Salvador detained by immigration authorities.  Although the injunction’s protections apply only to Salvadorans, using these provisions may indirectly benefit workers of other nationalities detained in the same raid.
 

     We have successfully used two provisions of this injunction to prevent the transfer of detained Salvadorans to detention centers far removed from their homes, families, and available low-cost or free legal services. As described in more detail below, the Orantes injunction contains provisions that (1) require immigration authorities to provide a phone number that relatives and counsel may call to obtain information about the location of detained Salvadorans and (2) restrict the transfer of detained class members to locations outside of the district where they were apprehended.

     Designated phone number.  Paragraph 6 of the injunction requires that ICE designate regional phone numbers that relatives and counsel may call to obtain information regarding detained class members.  ICE’s webpage currently titled “Information for Families of ICE Detainees” contains a link to a list of ICE’s Detention and Removal Operations (DRO) field offices, which includes for each office the office director’s name, the office’s address and phone number, and the geographical area for which the office is responsible.[*]  Under the injunction, a Salvadoran detainee’s relative or attorney who calls a DRO field office during normal working hours and provides the detainee’s name to the ICE officer who answers is to be informed of the detainee’s current location. If the detainee is scheduled for departure from the U.S., the inquiring individual should also be informed of the date and time and the place from which the detainee is scheduled to leave. If an attorney informs the officer that he or she wishes to communicate with a detained class member who is scheduled for voluntary departure and has not been able to do so, ICE “shall not expel the plaintiff class member until such counsel has had a reasonable opportunity for such communication.” Advocates have had difficulty obtaining timely information through this phone system, and if you are unable to obtain detainee location information within the same business day that you call, please contact the class counsel listed below.
 

Orantes Injunction’s Transfer Provisions

     Paragraph 11 of the Orantes injunction provides that immigration authorities “shall not transfer detained class members who are not represented by counsel from the [U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement] district where they are apprehended for at least seven (7) days,” in order to give them an opportunity to obtain counsel. Class members who obtain counsel may be transferred outside of the district during the seven-day period immediately following their apprehension, but in such cases the venue for the deportation or removal case remains in the district, and the class member must be returned to the district sufficiently in advance of any proceedings to allow him or her to consult with counsel.
     If the detained class member is transferred outside of the district of their apprehension after he or she obtains counsel, ICE must return the class member to the district “within a reasonable time after receiving a request to do so from the detainee’s counsel.” This provision of the injunction is critical for ensuring, first, that detainees are able to secure counsel for their removal proceedings. Transfer of detainees out of the area where they were apprehended cuts them off from friend and family networks that can help them obtain free or low-cost counsel. Once detained Salvadorans retain counsel, they may, under the injunction, be transferred out of the district where they were detained. At that point, however, the injunction’s protections function to ensure that detainees can keep the same counsel and do not have to restart immigration proceedings in a new jurisdiction.
     As a practical matter, ICE may be unwilling to transfer detained Salvadorans outside of the area where their counsel is located because ICE does not want the cost or hassle of moving the detainees back and forth between the new detention location and the place where their counsel, and court case, remains.
 

     Restrictions on transfer The injunction provides an important protection by barring for at least seven days the transfer of detained Salvadorans out of the area in which they were apprehended, unless a detainee has obtained counsel.  And with respect to detained Salvadorans who have obtained counsel, the injunction protects that precious attorney-client relationship even in the event that the detainee subsequently is transferred far away from his or her counsel.  Although these provisions apply only to Salvadorans, enforcing these rights for Salvadorans often has an indirect, positive effect on non-Salvadorans who are detained at the same time as Salvadorans (i.e., during the same raid).  For example, on the Friday afternoon following the MSE raid we learned that all the detained women, including the Salvadoran women, were scheduled to be transferred to a detention facility in Arizona.  As a result of our advocacy to ensure that the injunction’s transfer provision, which barred the transfer of the Salvadoran women, was honored, ICE agreed not to transfer any of the women out of California.  And, probably because there was insufficient detention space in the local area, all the women were released that Friday night.  

Resources (transfer-related):  

  • A copy of the current Orantes injunction is available here.
     

  • The list of phone numbers family members or counsel should use to find the location of detained Salvadorans (i.e., contact information for ICE Office of Detention and Removal Operations offices) is available here.  Call the phone number for the field office closest to where the detained Salvadoran was taken into custody.
     

  • Attorneys and legal workers who experience problems getting ICE personnel to honor these provisions of the Orantes injunction should contact Karen Tumlin or Linton Joaquin, counsel for the Orantes class.

Lessons learned (transfer-related):

  • Although the Orantes injunction protections are Salvadoran-specific, ensuring that ICE honors them may also protect the rights of non-Salvadoran detainees.


  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  next page


[*] The “Information for Families of ICE Detainees” webpage also can be accessed from a link at the bottom right-hand corner of ICE’s home page, www.ice.gov.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Home | About NILC | Publications | Community Education Materials
Immigrants & Employment | Immigrants & Public Benefits | Immigration Law & Policy
Trainings | Links