IMMIGRANTS & PUBLIC BENEFITS

Supplemental Security Income (SSI)

 

 

Saintelus, et al., v. Apfel:  Litigation seeks to amend "Cuban/Haitian entrant" definition used in SSI program
Immigrants’ Rights Update, Vol. 13, No. 5, August 30, 1999

The plaintiffs who filed a class action lawsuit to compel the Social Security Administration (SSA) to modify its definition of "Cuban/Haitian entrant" allege that the definition the agency currently uses has precluded many otherwise eligible applicants from obtaining Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits to which they are entitled.  The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 24, 1999.

The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) provides that Cuban/Haitian entrants are "qualified aliens" and grants them limited eligibility for SSI benefits.  The BBA mandates that the SSA use the definition of "Cuban/Haitian entrant" set forth in section 501(e) of the Refugee Education Assistance Act of 1980 in administering its SSI program.  Plaintiffs allege that the SSA has been failing to do so and seek to prohibit the agency from denying benefits to class members based on an incorrect definition of "Cuban/Haitian entrant."  They also want the SSA to issue instructions containing a definition of "Cuban/Haitian entrant" that conforms with the BBA’s mandate and to reopen the applications of Cubans and Haitians who applied for SSI on or after Aug. 22, 1996, and whose applications were denied solely due to their immigration status.

Recently, the SSA issued new instructions under its Program Operations Manual System (POMS) that pertain to Cuban/Haitian entrants.  Transmittal No. 7, SSA Pub. No. 68-0500502 (August 1999).  Among other things, the POMS amends the definition of "Cuban/Haitian entrant" and implements status verification procedures. Plaintiffs are reviewing the revised POMS to determine its effect on the litigation.

Plaintiffs are represented by Florida Legal Services, Florida Immigrant Advocacy Center, and the Florida Justice Institute.

Saintelus, et al., v. Apfel, No. 99-1464 (S.D. Fla. filed May 24, 1999).

 

Home | What's New | About NILC | Publications | Community Education Materials
Immigrants & Employment | Immigrants & Public Benefits | Immigration Law & Policy
Trainings | Links
California Immigrant Welfare Collaborative